Connect with us

General News

Special Prosecutor’s findings in Labianca case technically flawed – Customs Staff Association 

Published

on

20E0A06D 4E52 4AAE 8C90 58B41322EF45

The Customs Staff Association (CSA) has described as flawed the investigation conducted by the Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP) of alleged corrupt activities involving Labianca Group of Companies and the Customs Division of the Ghana Revenue Authority (GRA).

In a statement, the Association indicated that the report is misconceived and “and same is borne out of the misconception.”

According to the CSA, the Benchmark Values used by the OSP as a method of valuation rather than a risk management tool are inconsistent with the World Trade Organisation’s (WTO) Rules on Customs Valuation and Section 67 of the Customs Act.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/11Ls0AgeqIyhkljqk29_UZahkOPCWbSQr/view?usp=drivesdk

On the back of this, the group is confident that the findings of the OSP in the Labianca case is technically flawed.

“There’s therefore nothing wrong with the approvals made by the Commissioner since such approvals accord with the Customs Laws and established procedures in force,” parts of the statement read.

Earlier this week, the OSP published an investigative report which revealed that Labianca Group of Companies, a frozen foods company owned by a member of the Council of State, Eunice Jacqueline Buah Asomah-Hinneh had a shortfall in import duties in excess of ¢1.074 million.

The OSP contended that Ms Asomah-Hinneh used her position as a member of the Council of State and member of the Board of Directors of the Ghana Ports and Harbours Authority (GPHA) to get a favourable decision from the Customs Division.

The report signed by the Special Prosecutor, Kissi Agyebeng, alleged that Ms Asomah-Hinneh’s influence-peddling led to a reduction in the tax liabilities for her frozen foods company, thus, gaining undue market advantage in the competitive frozen foods industry.

But the Customs Division has refuted the Special Prosecutor’s claim against some of its officials in the case of Labianca Company.

The Commissioner of Customs, Col. Kwadwo Damoah (Rtd) who was indicted in the report accused the OSP of malicious intent with the aim to discredit the Customs officers.

Source: myjoyonline.com

Continue Reading

General News

CCTV footage shows final seconds before the train collision

Published

on

By

The sector Minister, John-Peter Amewu, uploaded footage on Facebook showing the train travelling at high speeds before colliding with the truck. The train pulled the abandoned Hyundai vehicle with registration number GS 9018-20 along the rails for a long distance.

A CCTV camera caught the final seconds before the train crash on the Tema-Mpakadan railway on Thursday during a test run.

According to a statement from the Ministry of Railways Development, the accident happened at about 12:10 p.m.

According to the Ministry, the accident occurred when the train approached the bend at Km76+100 and collided with a stalled car obstructing the rail track.

The sector Minister, John-Peter Amewu, uploaded footage on Facebook showing the train travelling at high speeds before colliding with the truck.

The train pulled the abandoned Hyundai vehicle with registration number GS 9018-20 along the rails for a long distance.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/370692529299532

Meanwhile, on Friday, the Juapong Circuit Court sentenced Abel Dzidotor, the truck’s 41-year-old driver, to six months in jail.

Continue Reading

General News

Driver of vehicle involved in train accident imprisoned 6 months

Published

on

By

The second allegation was for unauthorised halting, which violated Section 19 of Act 683 of 2004, as modified by Act 761 of 2008. Dzidotor pled guilty and received a 20-penalty unit punishment, or a five-month prison term if underpaid. The third allegation was for inflicting unauthorised damage, which violated Section 172b of Act 2960. Dzidotor pled guilty and got a six-month term of hard labour. The fourth accusation was for failing to present a driver's licence, which violated LI 21(80) regulation 47(2). Dzidotor pled not guilty, claiming that his licence was in the wrecked vehicle.

Abel Dzidotor, the driver allegedly responsible for the train tragedy, has been sentenced to six months in prison.

According to Citi News’ Benjamin Aklama, Dzidotor pleaded guilty to three of the four allegations against him.

These charges include irresponsible driving and inflicting illegal damage.

The first accusation was for reckless and inconsiderate driving, a breach of Section 3 of the RTA Act 683 (2004), as modified by Act 761 in 2008. Dzidotor pled guilty and got a punishment of 100 penalty units, equivalent to a possible 20-month jail term if not paid.

The second allegation was for unauthorised halting, which violated Section 19 of Act 683 of 2004, as modified by Act 761 of 2008. Dzidotor pled guilty and received a 20-penalty unit punishment, or a five-month prison term if underpaid.

The third allegation was for inflicting unauthorised damage, which violated Section 172b of Act 2960. Dzidotor pled guilty and got a six-month term of hard labour.

The fourth accusation was for failing to present a driver’s licence, which violated LI 21(80) regulation 47(2). Dzidotor pled not guilty, claiming that his licence was in the wrecked vehicle.

He has been ordered to show the licence to the court by May 9, 2024, or face serious repercussions.”

The Ghana Police Service detained the driver of a Hyundai truck with registration number GS 9018 – 20 on Thursday for allegedly causing a collision with a freshly imported train on the Tema-Mpakadan railway line.

A recently acquired train from Poland was involved in an accident during a test run.

According to a statement from the police, their preliminary investigation determined that the suspect driver left the car unattended on the railway line, resulting in a collision with the train.

The truck driver is believed to have gone to transport cement blocks when the truck became trapped on the rail because he was unable to use a pass-through beneath the bridge.

Continue Reading

General News

ECG Board disputes GH¢5.8m PURC fine

Published

on

By

They further maintained that the PURC's order is illegitimate, null, and void because it lacks jurisdiction. The attorneys further claimed that by imposing such a large punishment on their clients, the PURC had improperly assumed the powers of a High Court.

Board members of the Electricity Company of Ghana (ECG) who were charged by the Public Utilities Regulatory Commission (PURC) with failing to provide a consistent load-management schedule have disputed a substantial punishment levied on them.

On Tuesday, April 16, PURC imposed a GH¢5.8 million punishment on ECG board members who served from January 1 to March 18, 2024, for failing to give a load-shedding timeline following a series of power outages between January and March this year.

However, in a letter to PURC Executive Secretary Dr. Ishmael Ackah, attorneys representing the affected board members claimed that their clients are not responsible for the day-to-day management of ECG and hence cannot be held culpable.

“Board members of ECG are not responsible for the day-to-day administration of ECG and, therefore, are not principal officers within the intendment of Act 538 to be able to be held liable for a default on the part of the public utility ECG.”

They further maintained that the PURC’s order is illegitimate, null, and void because it lacks jurisdiction.

The attorneys further claimed that by imposing such a large punishment on their clients, the PURC had improperly assumed the powers of a High Court.

“The Commission’s order imposing regulatory charges on the members of the board is unlawful, null and void as same is without jurisdiction. By this order, the Commission has unlawfully clothed itself with the powers of the High Court, and imposed a sentence on the Board Members, without having been given the opportunity to be heard which amounts to a breach of the rules of natural justice.”

“Our clients, therefore, reject the contents of the regulatory order relative to any personal liability on their part,” the lawyers further argued.

Continue Reading

Trending

Optimized by Optimole